No Country For Old Men Ending
www.nocountryforoldmenending.com
People who has viewed this movie cannot refute that the No Country for Old Men Ending was jaw dropping. The story seems to be less about beginning, middle and closing, and more concerningthe totality of the human behavior. The good character (Brolin is the good character in this regardless if he took the money)fails because he becomes distracted from what he was doing, which was fending off the bad(Chigurh), which he seemed to be doing a good job of until he became aloof . So when he becomes absentminded by doing evil himself (adultery), evil kills him (Mexican thieves). Sin continues on its path of wreckage to his loved one’s house, where the pure, moral individual tries to talk sense with the diabolical, only to find that evil is unreasoning, “I’m not calling it, the coin doesn’t have a say in what happens to me, you do”, but evil cannot deduce this, or it wouldn’t be evil. Evil creates assumptions based on its own nature, not on someone else’s. Good film, can’t wait to read the novel. I stumbled across a site that does an magnificent job of summing up what the No Country for Old Men ending means.
You can check it out here.
